This essay is a follow-up to “The Perceptual Level as Given.” It will discuss a philosophical school that tried to answer the question of what the mind starts with: the sensualists/empiricists. The bulk of this essay will be an extended presentation of the sensualist approach of consciousness and knowledge as expounded by key sensualists like Hobbes and Hume. That section will be followed by a couple of my own problems with sensualism as they relate to the perceptual level of consciousness. (My issues with the sensualist view of the conceptual level will have to wait until I work through the inductions of concept-formation. I’ve also modernized the words in Hobbes’ and Hume’s quoted statements.)
A blog about what induction is, what others in the past have said about it, and what I think it is. Also includes posts about Objectivism from an inductive perspective.
Showing posts with label sense perception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sense perception. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Hobbes and Hume on the Senses: a Response
Labels:
axioms,
Ayn Rand,
Binswanger,
causation,
cause and effect,
concepts,
corollaries,
epistemology,
Hume,
induction,
intuition,
knowledge,
Objectivism,
Peikoff,
perception,
Philosophy,
Rand,
reason,
sense perception
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
The Perceptual Level as Given
One of the questions that philosophy asks is, “what information does the mind start with, what is ‘given’ with regard to our consciousness”? To answer this question, let’s briefly survey the levels of information that the mind deals with from the Objectivist perspective. As this principle sort of encapsulates the Objectivist view of perception, I’ll elaborate on some aspects of perception that I covered in previous essays. After giving this overview, I’ll discuss this principle’s relation to the previous intuitive inductions I’ve written about. The conclusion will discuss some overall lessons to be learned about epistemology from the Objectivist principles about perception that have been explained.
Labels:
axioms,
Ayn Rand,
causality,
concepts,
corollaries,
epistemology,
induction,
intuition,
knowledge,
Leonard Peikoff,
logic,
Objectivism,
Peikoff,
perception,
Philosophy,
Rand,
reason,
sense perception
Tuesday, September 1, 2015
The Senses as Necessarily Valid
Epistemology
is the branch of philosophy that studies the nature and means of human
knowledge. The field lays out the rules
and principles to guide the formation of concepts, the construction of logic,
and generally how to gain knowledge and show its validity. Objectivism holds that metaphysics and
epistemology combined are the theoretical base of any philosophy.[1]
There is
a little more context needed than metaphysics to fully confront the issues in
epistemology. We must first discuss 2 topics that make the field of
epistemology possible: sense-perception and volition (free will). I’ll also cover the axiomatic concept of “self”
at the end of this series, as I think it’s a subject that needs to be discussed
for a complete understanding of Objectivism.
Now we
can begin with the role and validity of human sensory-perception.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)